Ning, Y and Ling, F Y Y (2013) Reducing hindrances to adoption of relational behaviors in public construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11): 4013017, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Contractual focus is thought to lie on a spectrum ranging from formal contract behaviors to relational behaviors. This study aims to investigate whether the use of relational behaviors leads to higher-quality relationships among contracting parties in public construction projects, identify the hindrances to adopting relational behaviors in these contracts, and recommend measures to overcome the hindrances. Using a structured questionnaire, data were collected from respondents who had public project experiences in Singapore and thereafter analyzed using partial least squares-structural equation modeling. The result shows that a lack of relational background leads contracting parties to adopt formal contract behaviors in public projects, and this further leads to deterioration in the quality of relationships among contracting parties. The results also indicate that (1) a lack of long-term commitment and a lack of public client initiative lead to misalignment among contracting parties and (2) a lack of long-term commitment is positively influenced by a lack of relational background and public client unwillingness to commit to relational behaviors. This study contributes to knowledge by identifying the hindrances to adopting relational behaviors and proving empirically that greater adoption of relational behaviors gives rise to better relationship quality among contracting parties in public projects. Recommendations are offered to enable contracting parties in public projects to adopt more relational practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; contractual focus; hindrances; public projects; relational contracting; relationship quality |
| Index terms: | public client, public construction, contracting party, Singapore, relational contracting, partial least square, misalignment, public project, questionnaire, commitment, structural equation modelling, deterioration |
| Subjects: | Geography, infrastructure engineering, statistical analysis, building construction, sociology, practitioner, data collection methods, engineering problems, contractual arrangements, material degradation and durability, psychology |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here