Solis, F; Sinfield, J V and Abraham, D M (2013) Hybrid approach to the study of inter-organization high performance teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4), pp. 379-392. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As construction projects increase in scale and complexity, a major challenge is to ensure the effective transfer of relevant information to the right entities to make decisions, manage conflict, and solve challenges, which will allow organizations to achieve the goals of the project. Project teams whose members have the necessary attitudes, competencies, and skills to overcome this challenge are often termed high performing teams (HPTs). Building on recent studies about HPTs, this paper proposes a hybrid methodology that uses network theory and the jobs-to-be-done framework for the study of teams that aspire to develop high performance. Social network analysis (SNA) provides a reactive approach to the study of team connectivity and hierarchical leadership patterns and is complemented by the jobs-to-be-done framework that focuses on the drivers of the behavior of the various project organizations. The paper demonstrates these concepts by analyzing the characteristics of HPTs through a case study on a healthcare construction project. With this in mind, the contributions of this paper are twofold. The paper introduces jobs to be done as a proactive approach to initial team and work process design, given its focus on stakeholder motivations. In addition, the combination of SNA and jobs to be done allows the pursuit and iterative examination of both drivers of stakeholder behavior and their mechanisms of interaction, which generates more comprehensive insights than when each technique is used independently. Thus, this hybrid approach could facilitate the proactive design and refinement of HPTs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | high performance; innovation; jobs to be done; project organization; social network |
| Index terms: | connectivity, social network analysis, social network, project organization, motivation, process design, methodology, construction project, complexity, case study, interaction, project team |
| Subjects: | organizational theory, production management, research methods, systems engineering, behavioral psychology, sociology, networking, design methods, data collection methods, project delivery, psychology |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here