Sylvie, J R; Thomas, S R; Lee, S H; Chapman, R E and Smith, R T (2013) Development and interpretation of the security rating index. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), pp. 185-194. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper documents the second phase of a three-phase research effort to develop and deploy best practices for project security on industrial construction projects. Specifically, it details the development and interpretation and initial validation of the security rating index, which provides a means of quantitatively assessing the level of implementation of security practices for a project. The security rating index must be used in the context of threat and consequence levels. The threat level quantifies the intention and capability of an adversary to undertake detrimental actions, whereas the consequence level quantifies potential impacts of a security breach over the facility life cycle. This approach allows comparisons to be made between projects with similar security considerations. The security rating index is the first tool to integrate and quantify risk, consequence, and security best practice implementation. It can also be used as a checklist to integrate the appropriate security measures in the early phases of project planning. Once sufficient data are available, the security rating index will provide a means by which companies can gauge the level of security integration of their own projects against similar projects within the industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessments; industrial facilities; project management; security; terrorism |
| Index terms: | terrorism, life cycle, industrial construction, implementation, project management, best practice, project planning, integration, validation, documents |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, building construction, terrorism studies, professional development, project management theory and practice, contractual arrangements, business, value management, control systems |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here