Toward automated earned value tracking using 3D imaging tools

Turkan, Y; Bosché, F; Haas, C T and Haas, R (2013) Toward automated earned value tracking using 3D imaging tools. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4), pp. 423-433. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Accurate and frequent construction progress tracking provides critical input data for project systems such as cost, schedule control, and billing. Unfortunately, conventional progress tracking is labor intensive, sometimes subject to negotiation, and often driven by arcane rules. Attempts to improve progress tracking have recently focused on automation, using technologies such as three-dimensional imaging, global positioning systems, ultra wide band (UWB) indoor locating, handheld computers, voice recognition, wireless networks, and other technologies in various combinations. However, one limit of these approaches is their focus on counting objects or milestones rather than value. In this paper, a four-dimensional model recognition-driven automated progress tracking system that transforms objects to their earned values is examined via the analysis of data from the construction of a steel reinforced concrete structure and a steel structure. It is concluded that automated, object oriented recognition systems that convert each object to its earned value can substantially improve the accuracy of progress tracking, and thus, better support project systems like billing. The contribution of this study is an argument based on scientific results for refocusing future research onto automated earned value tracking, which is ultimately what is needed in practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information models; construction progress control; cost codes; earned value; five-dimensional; four-dimensional; laser scanning; object recognition
Index terms: object recognition, automation, reinforced concrete, schedule control, negotiation, progress tracking, construction progress tracking, laser scanning, steel structure, accuracy
Subjects: automation and robotics, project controls, specialized materials and systems, conflict resolution, analytical methods, control systems, professional development, building materials, computer vision
Topics: Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Time Control, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here