Vaughan, J L; Leming, M L; Liu, M and Jaselskis, E (2013) Cost-benefit analysis of construction information management system implementation: Case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4), pp. 445-455. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In construction projects, construction managers spend a significant portion of their time gathering project data, assessing production rates, communicating with project participants, and tracking project quality. Executing those tasks manually reduces efficiency and can result in less effective project management operations. In order to improve efficiency of information process flow, various types of construction information management systems (CIMSs) have been introduced to construction projects. However, due to the difficulty of tracking fragmental and illusive data, measuring the cost and benefit of the implementation and evaluating the trade-off remain a challenge for construction practitioners. This paper's contributions to the body of knowledge include (1) proposing a framework to assess tangible and semitangible or intangible costs and benefits of innovative construction technology application, (2) determining costs and benefits of the use of CIMSs by conducting a product-specific case study, and (3) summarizing lessons learned through the application of a CIMS from the first-hand users so that construction managers can avoid pitfalls in other projects. This study provides data collected during real-time immersion in the project as part of the project team over a 6 month period. The study found that the use of CIMSs, coupled with mobile technologies, increased efficiency and decreased clerical time of operations-level construction personnel, and thereby increased value to the project through improved allocation of managerial time. The internal observation and analysis provide a useful guidance to project managers who are interested in implementing CIMS in construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; management; planning; software; technology |
| Index terms: | efficiency, project manager, case study, mobile technology, implementation, project management, project team, construction technology, management system, construction personnel, project data, construction practitioner, construction project, construction manager, lessons learned, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | professional development, project management theory and practice, production management, performance management, management, digital engineering, data collection methods, workforce, profession, project delivery, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, digital technology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here