Xie, J and Thomas Ng, S (2013) Multiobjective Bayesian network model for public-private partnership decision support. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(9), pp. 1069-1081. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
To improve the chance of success of a public-private partnership (PPP) scheme, it is essential to consider the feasibility of the scheme both from the economical and noneconomical perspectives according to the interests of all three key stakeholders, namely the government, the private investor, and end-users. Acknowledging the diverse and sometimes conflicting interests of the stakeholders, decision makers must identify a viable scheme that could satisfy public accountability, commercial interests, and social consideration of the government, investor, and community, respectively. However, because each decision item could have several possible values or states, it is difficult for decision makers to come up with different PPP schemes by adopting the conventional analytical methods. This paper proposes the use of Bayesian network (BN) techniques to imitate human reasoning and conduct multiobjective decision making. By establishing a decision network that connects the decision items, evaluating criteria, and the ultimate objectives (i.e., the satisfaction of the three main stakeholders), evaluation can be conducted through the BN and the noisy-OR gate concepts. A weighted score approach is applied to combine the objectives of the three stakeholders into a single value. This enables decision makers to evaluate and compare different PPP alternatives and identify a suitable strategy that could minimize the conflict, thereby ultimately increasing the chance of success of a PPP scheme.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian network; contracting; decision network; multiobjective decisions; public-private partnerships |
| Index terms: | satisfaction, investor, partnership, strategy, accountability, reasoning, bayesian network, decision support, decision-making |
| Subjects: | probabilistic model, management, project delivery, cognitive psychology, liability law, sociology, partnership management, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Project Management, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here