Baccarini, D and Love, P E D (2014) Statistical characteristics of cost contingency in water infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(3): 4013063, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Cost contingency is one component of a project's budget to cater for cost growth. The determination of a project's cost contingency is a pervasive problem because the amount that is incorporated into an estimate is invariably insufficient to accommodate the cost growth of a project. This study analyzed the statistical characteristics of cost contingency and cost growth experienced in 228 similar Australian water infrastructure projects that were procured by using traditional lump contracts. It was revealed that mean project final costs exceeded the approved budgets that contained contingency. The mean contingency percentage addition was 8.46%, yet the mean contingency required for the final cost was 13.58% for the sampled projects. Thus, the deterministic percentage addition, used by the sponsor to accommodate for cost growth beyond their baseline budget, was inaccurate. To improve the accuracy of a contingency estimate, the empirical distributions of cost contingency and cost performance were examined to determine their best-fit probability distribution. The research presented in this paper demonstrates that determining the best fit probability distribution provides a more robust and defendable basis for selecting a cost contingency than the traditional deterministic percentage approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; cost contingency; cost growth; water infrastructure projects |
| Index terms: | estimate, infrastructure project, Australia, probability distribution, cost performance, accuracy |
| Subjects: | professional development, Geography, economics, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here