Achieving sustainable building maintenance through optimizing life-cycle carbon, cost, and labor: Case in Hong Kong

Chiang, Y H; Zhou, L; Li, J; Lam, P T I and Wong, K W (2014) Achieving sustainable building maintenance through optimizing life-cycle carbon, cost, and labor: Case in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(3): 5014001, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The need to maintain an ever-increasing building stock especially in developed economies is growing. This study provides a computational framework to find the optimal solution for sustainable building maintenance. The methodology is composed of two major steps. First, the authors evaluate the life-cycle carbon emission, cost, and labor requirements of a project, which embody important environmental, economic, and social aspects of sustainable building maintenance. Second, the authors develop an optimization model to identify the optimal portfolio of materials that would minimize three sustainability objectives including carbon emission, cost, and labor deployment in their respective turns one at a time. By testing the model with seven scenarios in a case study, the authors demonstrate how this typical case project could significantly improve its sustainability objectives from environmental, economic, and social perspectives. This optimization methodology is generic. It can be readily applied to other new and nonresidential projects of varying scales and in circumstances with a different set of decision criteria. Finally, policy suggestions are proposed to promote sustainable building maintenance in Hong Kong.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: carbon, cost, and labor requirement; life-cycle assessment; multiobjective decision making; quantitative methods; sustainable building maintenance
Index terms: decision criteria, testing, labour requirement, case study, carbon emission, Hong Kong, quantitative method, methodology, decision-making, sustainable building, social aspect, building stock
Subjects: data collection methods, climate science, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, management, research methods, Geography, sustainable construction, asset management, decision analysis, sociology
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here