Doloi, H (2014) Rationalizing the implementation of web-based project management systems in construction projects using PLS-SEM. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(7): 04014026, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
While web-based project management (WBPM) systems have been widely implemented in most construction projects, the current literature lacks any clear consensus on rationalizing such decisions across the industry. In an attempt to understand the factors influencing the implementation of web-based systems and their performance in construction projects, a theoretical structural model has been established, termed the partial least-square structural equation model (PLS-SEM). The effect of six latent variables on the performance of WBPM systems has been analyzed using the empirical data collected from a questionnaire survey of 77 respondents within the construction industry. The results of the data analysis suggest that the implementation of web-based systems (PMB) is rationalized with the two key factors being complexity (PC) and information streamline (IS) in the project. The general perception of increased users' satisfaction (US) and transparency and accountability (TA) has no strong empirical basis for rationalizing the use of web-based systems across projects. Effective monitoring and control (EMC) during project delivery can only be marginally enhanced by implementing WBPM systems. The key significance of this research is the unfolding of tacit knowledge of these key factors and addressing the limitations reported in previous research in the context of implementation of WBPM systems. Appropriate consideration of these factors would potentially contribute to the development of company procedures or to enhance existing knowledge within the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | information technologies; project management; project performance; structural model; web-based systems |
| Index terms: | satisfaction, project delivery, project management, transparency, implementation, construction industry, structural equation model, project performance, monitoring, survey, accountability, web-based system, data analysis, complexity, information technology, tacit knowledge, questionnaire, construction project |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, statistical analysis, liability law, industry analysis, project management theory and practice, professional development, production management, digital technology, project delivery, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, computing systems, control systems |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Procurement, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here