Condition prediction models for oil and gas pipelines using regression analysis

El-Abbasy, M S; Senouci, A; Zayed, T; Mirahadi, F and Parvizsedghy, L (2014) Condition prediction models for oil and gas pipelines using regression analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(6): 4014013, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Although they are the safest means of transporting oil and gas products, pipelines can sometimes fail with hazardous consequences and large business losses. The decision to replace, repair, or rehabilitate depends mainly on the condition of the pipeline. Assessing and predicting its condition is therefore a key step in the maintenance plan of a pipeline. Several models have recently been developed to predict pipeline failures and conditions. However, most of these models were limited to the use of corrosion as the sole factor to assess the condition of pipelines. The objective of this paper is to develop models that assess and predict the condition of oil and gas pipelines based on several factors including corrosion. The regression analysis technique was used to develop the condition prediction models based on historical inspection data of three existing pipelines in Qatar. In addition, a condition assessment scale for pipelines was built based on expert opinion. The models were able to satisfactorily predict pipeline condition with an average percent validity above 96% when applied to the validation data set. The models are expected to help decision makers assess and predict the condition of existing oil and gas pipelines and hence prioritize their inspection and rehabilitation planning.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: condition prediction; oil and gas pipelines; quantitative methods; regression analysis
Index terms: oil and gas, Qatar, regression analysis, pipeline, inspection, validity, validation, corrosion, quantitative method, repair, prediction model
Subjects: material degradation and durability, prediction and forecasting, data analysis and analytics, evaluation and assessment methods, statistical analysis, quality assurance, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, maintenance engineering, professional development, Geography
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here