Elazouni, A and Abido, M A (2014) Enhanced trade-off of construction projects: Finance-resource-profit. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9): 04014043, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The parameters of finance requirements, resource leveling, and anticipated profit have significant influence on many aspects of project management. These parameters interact and occasionally conflict with each other. Accordingly, achievement of a balance between these three parameters is crucial to ensure the accomplishment of project objectives. A multi-objective multimode scheduling optimization algorithm is proposed to establish the optimal trade-off between these three parameters. The strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA) was implemented to obtain the solutions comprising the Pareto-optimal trade-off. The developed SPEA was validated by reproducing identical results of a time/cost trade-off problem in the literature. The developed SPEA was used to obtain the Pareto-optimal trade-off of a network of nine multimode activities that comprised fifty solutions. The trade-off of fifty solutions allows decision makers explore the impact of finance upon the efficiency of resource utilization and anticipated profit and thus select the solution that achieves the desired balance between the parameters. In addition, a fuzzy-based technique was used to identify the best compromise solution of the fifty solutions. The results proved the robustness and scalability of the developed algorithm. Finally, the finance-resource-profit trade-off offers potential solutions of maximized anticipated profit.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost and schedule; evolutionary algorithms; finance; multi-objective; optimization; resource leveling; time-cost trade-off |
| Index terms: | efficiency, resource utilization, resource levelling, evolutionary algorithm, project management, time-cost trade-off, scheduling, profit, construction project, optimization algorithm |
| Subjects: | production management, project management theory and practice, quantity surveying, algorithms, performance management, resource management, economic analysis, site logistics, operations research |
| Topics: | Time Control, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Project Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here