Gelisen, G and Griffis, F H (2014) Automated productivity-based schedule animation: Simulation-based approach to time-cost trade-off analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(4): B4013007, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Many studies of construction labor productivity are at a macro level. These macrolevel studies attempt to quantify the productivity or changes in productivity over the entire industry or a segment of the industry. This study is aimed at a micro or project level examination of productivity. The tool developed allows a company to predict, manage, and even optimize the productivity associated with a project or levels of projects. Automated productivity-based schedule animation (APBSA) is a dynamic scheduling methodology that stochastically utilizes weekly trended construction labor productivity data in order to automatically update the baseline schedule that was created at the beginning of the project by the construction manager. APBSA reports the construction activity duration variances and animates the progress of the job with most current data available in a four-dimensional (4D) environment. Contractors can improve their planning by utilizing APBSA with building information modeling (BIM) which will help them to improve their craft productivity. As a case study, a three-story Systems Engineering Facility III of Hanscom Air Force Base (AFB) was modeled. The model was developed in order to demonstrate the impacts of time and cost-based stochastic productivity indices on the baseline schedule. A time-cost trade-off analysis was also performed in order to show effects of duration variations on the cost of the project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 4-d; animation; BIM; building information modeling; cost and schedule; dynamic; productivity; schedule; simulation; stochastic; time-cost trade-off |
| Index terms: | variance, building information modelling, case study, construction activity, productivity, systems engineering, construction labour, duration, time-cost trade-off, scheduling, methodology, variation, construction manager |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, research methods, quantity surveying, management, systems engineering, information systems, measurement and scaling, project controls, profession, data collection methods, construction operations, operations research |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Site Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here