Bracing of wood composite I-joists to resist lateral buckling from walking loads

Hindman, D P; Bamberg, C R and Nussbaum, M A (2014) Bracing of wood composite I-joists to resist lateral buckling from walking loads. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9): 04014037, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Lateral buckling of unbraced beams during construction may be an important cause of fatalities and injuries. Temporary bracing to restrict lateral buckling is a potential preventive approach, but has received little study. Lateral acceleration, lateral displacement, and rotation of wood composite I-joists were measured under different bracing conditions while participants traversed the joists. Five different bracing stiffnesses and two different bracing placements were examined. Lateral displacement and rotation increased near the midspan of the joist, while acceleration remained consistent. Greater lateral displacement and rotation were found with increasing participant weight and lack of construction experience. Construction experience was found to be a significant factor in the amount of joist motion. A safety platform similar to the testing methods discussed may have potential as a training tool to expose workers to partially braced joists. The relationship of lateral displacement and rotation with bracing stiffness was nonlinear. Bracing placement had little effect upon lateral displacement and rotation. Increased bracing stiffness reduced lateral displacement and rotation at a decreasing rate, indicating that bracing stiffness can be optimized to reduce cost.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bracing of beams; construction materials and methods; human walking loading; lateral buckling; wood composite i-joist
Index terms: injury, fatalities, beam, placement, platform, construction material, composite, acceleration, testing, loading, wood
Subjects: management, construction operations, health risk and incident analysis, building materials, project controls, structural engineering, health conditions and diseases, materials science, professional practice, traditional and composite building materials, digital design
Topics: Time Control, Construction Materials, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here