Huang, W H; Tserng, H P; Jaselskis, E J and Lee, S Y (2014) Dynamic threshold cash flow-based structural model for contractor financial prequalification. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(10): 04014047, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
It is important for project owners to select only those construction contractors who are uniquely qualified to perform the work because this leads to the greatest chance for achieving project success. Owners typically screen contractors by using the following key criteria: financial stability, technical ability, management capability, health and safety, and reputation. This study focuses primarily on the construction contractor's financial stability during the prequalification phase and employs a dynamic threshold cash flow based structural model (DCFM) to assess the credit quality score for each construction contractor. This model differs from the existing credit model because it only requires accounting statement information; thus, it is applicable to both publicly listed and private construction contractors. Moreover, only a small portion of companies are rated in the construction industry; this model is especially useful for owners to assess the credit quality of unrated construction companies. The Standard & Poor's issuer credit rating is used as the benchmark to evaluate the model's discrimination ability to differentiate financially qualified contractors from unqualified contractors. Additionally, the validation indicator area under curve (AUC) is utilized to demonstrate whether the DCFM can identify different credit grade firms according to the model's credit quality scores. The AUC results of the first three years of this model are 0.861, 0.833, and 0.819, indicating that this model achieves excellent discriminatory ability and is useful for assessing the credit risk of construction contractors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash flow structural model; contractor financial prequalification; credit risk; dynamic threshold; quantitative methods; receiver operating characteristic curve |
| Index terms: | quantitative method, validation, construction contractor, accounting, discrimination, health and safety, cash flow, construction company, stability, construction industry, project success, owner |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, organization, practitioner, sociology, industry analysis, professional ethics, structural engineering, financial management, health safety and environment, project management theory and practice, professional development |
| Topics: | Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here