Sensitivity of earned value schedule forecasting to S-curve patterns

Kim, B C and Kim, H J (2014) Sensitivity of earned value schedule forecasting to S-curve patterns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(7): 04014023, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper examines sensitivity of the performance of seven project duration forecasting methods in the earned value management (EVM) literature to characteristic patterns of planned value and earned value S-curves. Specifically, this paper aims at identifying relative robustness and early warning capacity of six deterministic methods and one probabilistic method with respect to the nonlinearity of progress curves and the schedule delay patterns. The sensitivity analysis in this paper shows that forecast accuracy and early warning credibility of deterministic methods are very sensitive to the S-curve patterns, especially early in a project. The results also indicate that the probabilistic method (the Kalman filter earned value method) is the only method among the seven alternatives that is robust with respect to the progress curve nonlinearity and the schedule delay patterns. Consequently, this paper would positively contribute to the practice of project schedule control by providing practical guidance for and valuable insights into a sanity test on the forecasts and warning signals from the forecasting methods so that more informed decisions are made and unnecessary control actions triggered by false warning can be effectively prevented.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost and schedule; earned value; kalman filter; s-curve; schedule forecasting; schedule risk
Index terms: forecasting, schedule delay, planned value, s-curve, duration, sensitivity analysis, early warning, accuracy, earned value management, schedule control, kalman filter
Subjects: prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, control systems, project controls, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, economics, financial risk, professional development
Topics: Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here