Tender pricing environment of subcontractors in the United Kingdom

Laryea, S and Lubbock, A (2014) Tender pricing environment of subcontractors in the United Kingdom. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(1): 04013029, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Contractors rely significantly on quotations from subcontractors to price a tender. However, much of the research carried out in the United Kingdom (UK) on construction-tendering has been done from the perspective of the relationship between the contractor and client. This paper addresses that gap by identifying and examining the major barriers to effective pricing of tenders by subcontractors and the business environment of their commercial relationships with contractors. A questionnaire study involving 94 subcontractors and semistructured interviews with five of them was conducted in 2011. The primary barriers to providing better cost-certainty and quality of response in quotations to contractors relate to quality of documents, bidding time, competition, resource levels, information and communication technology, unethical behavior by the contractor, uneven collaborative relationships, input specificity, level of relationship that exists, and the time to assimilate and provide the output response. Contractors and clients should help address the barriers. For contractors, this can enhance competitiveness, profitability, and supply-chain relationships. For clients, this can lead to better project outcomes because subcontractors form a major part of the organizational structure of projects. Addressing the concerns expressed by subcontractors may also require a collaborative approach, perhaps in conjunction with an industry-wide investigation and plan of action.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracting; contractor; interview; questionnaire; subcontractor; tender-pricing; tendering; United Kingdom
Index terms: pricing, project outcome, investigation, competitiveness, profitability, interview, organizational structure, information and communication technology, United Kingdom, questionnaire, competition, documents, bidding, subcontractor
Subjects: Geography, professional development, market analysis, sociology, practitioner, computing systems, data collection methods, project completion, bidding, economic analysis
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here