Leung, M Y; Yu, J and Chan, Y S (2014) Focus group study to explore critical factors of public engagement process for mega development projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(3): 4013061, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Due to the dynamic nature of construction projects, multiple stakeholders with various expectations are often involved. To achieve consensus among different stakeholders, public engagement (PE) is increasingly adopted for mega development projects. However, it is really difficult to satisfy various stakeholder needs if PE is inappropriately conducted. PE has been criticized for its illogical and unsystematic processes underlying decisions. Hence, the current study aimed to explore and identify critical factors of the PE process in order to improve final performance. To achieve this aim, four focus groups were held involving different types of stakeholders (e.g., governmental departments, construction professionals, interest groups, and local residents). PE process factors, addressed in the focus groups, fell into two main categories: logical decision-making process and team behaviors, with the latter divided into task and personal dimensions. The results of the current study were used as the first stage of a comprehensive study aimed at improving PE performance. Several practical recommendations for facilitating the PE process were also pointed out in the group discussion, such as the application of logical and systematic decision-making processes, the establishment of effective evaluation methods and frameworks for evaluation criteria, and the usage of transparent and equal discussion rules.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | focus group; logical decision-making process; organizational issues; public engagement; team behaviors |
| Index terms: | interest group, construction professional, decision-making process, organizational issue, construction project, public engagement, critical factor, dimension, focus group |
| Subjects: | participation process, decision analysis, production management, risk assessment, professional development, data collection methods, business, sociology, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here