Case study of innovative top-down construction method with channel-type excavation

Li, M G; Chen, J J; Xu, A J; Xia, X H and Wang, J H (2014) Case study of innovative top-down construction method with channel-type excavation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(5): 05014003, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Although the conventional top-down construction method is widely used in deep excavation, it has the drawback of low efficiency attributable to the long hauling distance and the possibility of the occurrence of excessive excavation deformation and construction risk. This paper introduces a case of deep metro station excavation at West Shanghai Railway Station. The top-down construction method must be used because the excavation is located under a running high-speed railway, and an innovative excavation scheme is proposed to improve construction efficiency and to control excavation deformation. In this method, an operation channel for earth hauling is first excavated in the middle of the excavation. With the available operation channel, the soil on both sides of the channel is excavated simultaneously in a segment pattern, and the required strut systems are subsequently constructed. Both the excavated soil and the construction materials are transported through the channel. This channel-type construction method that resolves the conflict between soil excavation and substructure construction allows for continuous excavation and, thus, reduces construction time and decreases excavation deformation. The case study demonstrates that the presented channel-type excavation is very effective in shortening construction time and reducing both construction cost and excavation deformation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: channel type; construction efficiency; construction materials and methods; deformation; excavation; top-down method
Index terms: construction cost, Shanghai, case study, deep excavation, construction time, construction material, excavation, construction method, railway station, efficiency, deformation
Subjects: Geography, infrastructure and transport systems, material properties and characteristics, building materials, financial and cost management, building construction, construction operations, data collection methods, project controls, performance management, geotechnical engineering
Topics: Geographical Context, Quality Management, Construction Materials, Time Control, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here