Lindhard, S (2014) Understanding the effect of variation in a production system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(11): 4014051, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Variation is a root cause to waste in a production system because it creates interruptions in the production system. Variation is dissipating through the production flow and reduces productivity; therefore, to minimize the effect, variations need to be handled with great care. This study examined how task starting time and duration is affected by variation. By simulating a sequence of work tasks using a normal distribution, it has been possible to analyze variations' effect on task starting time, task durations, crew waiting time, and so on. Four situations were simulated, and teen iterations were calculated and analyzed. The analysis revealed that variation itself does not create waste. Waste is only emerging between handoffs; thus, increasing work task duration decreases the effect of variation. Moreover, by comparing a linear sequence and a network of activities, the effect of variation was found to depend on the design of the sequence.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost and schedule; simulation; variation; waste; workflow |
| Index terms: | production system, productivity, workflow, duration, variation |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, project controls, management, manufacturing engineering |
| Topics: | Time Control, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here