Ling, F Y Y; Ke, Y; Kumaraswamy, M M and Wang, S (2014) Key relational contracting practices affecting performance of public construction projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(1): 04013034, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Relational contracting (RC) is based on the recognition of mutual benefits and win-win scenarios that are achieved through more cooperative relationships among the contracting parties in a project. Although RC principles are less difficult to apply in private-sector projects, it has not been established whether public-sector projects can enjoy the full benefits of RC. This study aims to investigate the effective RC practices that are found in China's public construction projects. The specific objectives are to (1) evaluate project performance levels in terms of cost, time, quality, and client satisfaction; (2) investigate the extent to which RC practices were adopted; and (3) identify the RC practices that lead to better performance. Because of the large geographical area of China, the surveys conducted were confined to Beijing and Hong Kong only. A structured questionnaire was designed to collect qualitative data. The results show that (1) public construction projects achieved significant success in quality performance and client satisfaction, but not in budget and schedule performance; and (2) RC practices were adopted to varying extents in public projects. The findings contribute to knowledge by identifying the specific RC practices that could boost project performance significantly. Another contribution to knowledge is the discovery that the relational contract theory is applicable to public projects notwithstanding the need to keep relations at arm's length. A framework to manage public projects using the RC approach is recommended for adoption in Hong Kong and other countries that adopt project management style along the Project Management Institute's framework. A different framework is recommended for adoption in Beijing and places that have a centrally planned and controlled economic system so as to help public projects achieve better project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | beijing; contracting; Hong Kong; public construction projects; relational contracting; strategy |
| Index terms: | public project, questionnaire, China, schedule performance, strategy, survey, quality performance, public construction, project performance, Beijing, client satisfaction, project management, relational contracting, Hong Kong, contract theory, contracting party |
| Subjects: | project delivery, legal systems, contractual arrangements, practitioner, client relations, data collection methods, building construction, project controls, project management theory and practice, infrastructure engineering, Geography, management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here