Pinpointing safety leadership factors for safe construction sites in Trinidad and Tobago

Martin, H and Lewis, T M (2014) Pinpointing safety leadership factors for safe construction sites in Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(2): 04013046, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction industry safety performance is of grave concern to practitioners and lawmakers. Despite a determined effort to improve, the results are still disappointing. Improving the industry's track record requires an in-depth understanding of the factors that drive risks to individual safety and of how behavior and attitudes can be improved. Construction managers lack knowledge of the safety leadership characteristics, which specifically reduce risk-taking behavior of subordinates on construction sites. This information is presented in this research. A leadership-based safety model consisting of subordinates' self-reported accident and near miss records were investigated along with leadership considerations and initiating constructs, the construction manager's safety behavior and attitude profile, and the safety climate characteristics to determine whether any of these factors contributed significantly to a safer construction site. A stepwise regression model was developed to determine key drivers toward the risk-taking behavior of construction workers. Construction managers were also classified by their effective management of safety. Contrary to the postmodern perspective on safety leadership, construction managers who focused on safety standards on-site, ruled with an iron rod, and needled people working with them for greater efforts were more effective at reducing accidents on-site than those construction managers who did otherwise.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accident; intervention; labor and personnel issues; leadership; risk; safety
Index terms: construction worker, construction industry, Trinidad and Tobago, safety behaviour, regression model, safety performance, safety standards, practitioner, construction manager, construction site, safety leadership, safety climate, risk taking, personnel
Subjects: practitioner, profession, work location, Geography, health safety and environment, management, decision-making and reasoning, industry analysis, statistical analysis, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here