Concrete placing productivity using a novel neural network design

Forbes, D R; McGurnaghan, H; Graham, L D and Smith, S D (2004) Concrete placing productivity using a novel neural network design. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2004, Edinburgh, UK.

Abstract

For planning purposes an accurate estimate of the productivity for insitu concreting operations is desirable. Various methods have been investigated to model such productivity; this paper will consider a novel neural network architecture the Twin Nested Recurrent Network (TNRN), in the search for increasingly accurate predictions. Neural networks are trained by providing them with a set of data from historic projects. Providing a larger training data set generally increases the accuracy of the output. In conventional neural network modelling, this training set is based upon the outcomes of a series of individual operations and thus is limited. The approach to be used here would expand this training set by considering the productivity of each individual concrete delivery used in each operation thus creating a much larger training set of data from which the neural network can learn. Further, by preparing the data in this way, an original architecture can be developed for the model. This architecture is a twin-loop nested recurrent network. The network is presented with each delivery for a given operation, and then with the productivity of the operation itself. Initial results are encouraging: this approach allows a much greater flexibility and a significant reduction in the sensitivity of changes to the network training functions.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: concreting; neural networks; planning; estimation; modelling
Index terms: modelling, placing, productivity, concreting, estimate, estimation, accuracy, neural network
Subjects: building construction, analytical methods, artificial intelligence, management, professional development, financial and cost management, concrete and cementitious materials
Topics: Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here