Morley, D; Lu, M and Abourizk, S (2014) Identification of invariant average weighted haul distance to simplify earthmoving simulation modeling in planning site grading operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(12): 04014057, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This research is intended to generate relevant and quantitative decision support based on limited data and information available in the context of planning earthmoving operations at the site-grading design or early project planning stage. The researchers apply and extend the concept of haul effort in a two-axis grid. This enables calculation of the average weighted haul distance, which is shown to be invariant by conducting simulation experiments using a heuristic algorithm and making a quantitative comparison to the center of mass for a rigid body. This research applies the discrete event simulation approach commonly used to model the handling of multiple earthmoving jobs in a grading site, each job having a particular haul distance. The significant and unique contribution that has been made in this research is to substitute one unique average weighted haul distance for multiple haul distances between numerous cut and fill cells in the site grid system as simulation modeling input. When the same fleet is applied in both detailed and simplified simulation models, the question of validation concerns whether the simplified model still maintains the accuracy of the detailed model. Using a simple test problem and a real-world case, the researchers validate the proposed method and demonstrate the benefits of applying simulation for construction planning without incurring the previously necessary and prohibitively high cost associated with constructing detailed simulation models.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | earthmoving; earthwork; estimation; planning; project planning and design; simulation; simulation models |
| Index terms: | validation, project planning, earthwork, decision support, accuracy, simulation modelling, earthmoving, construction planning, discrete event simulation, heuristic, simulation experiment, estimation |
| Subjects: | control systems, risk assessment, construction planning, analytical methods, financial and cost management, construction operations, modelling and simulation, construction methods, professional development, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here