Ning, Y and Ling, F Y Y (2014) Boosting public construction project outcomes through relational transactions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(1): 04013037, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Drawing upon relational contract (RC) theory and network embeddedness theory, this study investigates how relational transactions (i.e., RC norms and network strategies) affect relationship quality and outcomes of public construction projects. The results of a questionnaire survey of 104 public projects in Singapore show that relationship quality and relational transactions have a positive impact on public project outcomes (i.e., time, cost, quality performance, and client satisfaction). The empirical results show that effective information sharing gives rise to better relationship quality, and good relationships further enhance time performance, quality performance, and client satisfaction. The findings show that adoption of these RC norms affects outcomes in the following ways: (1) propriety of means contributes significantly to cost performance, (2) flexibility and contractual solidarity have a significant impact on time performance, and (3) harmonization within the social matrix and propriety of means allow for a significantly higher level of satisfaction. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by empirically showing that good relationship quality can contribute to better outcomes in public construction projects. It also identifies RC norms that have a positive effect on public project outcomes and relationship quality. Recommendations of relational transaction practices that could improve public project outcomes are offered.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; network embeddedness; outcomes; public projects; relational contracting norms; relational transactions; relationships; Singapore |
| Index terms: | project outcome, relational contracting, Singapore, satisfaction, public construction, quality performance, network strategy, embeddedness, client satisfaction, information sharing, drawing, survey, body of knowledge, norms, cost performance, public project, time performance, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | economics, data exchange, infrastructure engineering, Geography, building construction, sociology, networking, project controls, client relations, project completion, data collection methods, technical documentation, project delivery, knowledge management, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Time Control, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here