O'Connor, J T; O'Brien, W J and Choi, J O (2014) Critical success factors and enablers for optimum and maximum industrial modularization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(6): 4014012, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Modularization is a well-established technique that can improve the construction industry by exporting a portion of site-based work to fabrication shops. However, its application in the industry is limited. The Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) industry needs new approaches to reach higher levels of modularization. The purpose of this study is to determine what changes in current EPC processes are needed to create an optimal environment for a broader and more effective use of modularization. In creating such an nvironment, it is necessary to know the factors that lead to success. The most influential critical success factors (CSFs; 21 total) have been determined by the expertise of a research team who compiled a detailed list by adding CSF enablers. CSF enablers are additional steps that can facilitate accomplishment of the associated CSF. A closer look at the top five CSFs indicates that project teams should pay particular attention to module envelope limitations, team agreement on project drivers, adequate owner-planning resources and processes, timely freeze of scoping and design, and due recognition of possible early completion from modularization. This CSFs analysis and addition of enablers provide guidelines and ways to implement strategies for successful modularization in a project and leverages modularization to benefit capital projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical sucess factors; industrial project; modularization; offsite fabrication; ppmof; preassembly; prefabrication; productivity; project planning and design |
| Index terms: | project planning, critical success factor, strategy, project team, fabrication, construction industry, prefabrication, module, capital project, modularization, owner, productivity |
| Subjects: | strategic project management, project delivery, control systems, building construction, sociology, industry analysis, architectural elements, management, manufacturing engineering |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here