Palacios, J L; Gonzalez, V and Alarcón, L F (2014) Selection of third-party relationships in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(4): B4013005, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction projects involve intensive and constant interaction among the parties involved. This interaction requires an efficient use of collaborative processes focused on the fulfillment of the project's objective. Traditional types of relationships have proven ineffective in developing successful projects, and can generate adverse relationships between the parties negatively influencing performance. Using primarily an exploratory and descriptive approach, the following research has developed a tool to improve the relationships between those involved in the course of a construction project. Based on an extensive literary review in which the principles of Partnering, Alliancing, Lean Project Delivery, and Relational Contracts were analyzed, and considering interviews with project management experts, three types of relationships were identified that can be used to establish contractual relationships: (1) traditional/transactional, which operates on risk transference; (2) partnering/transactional with agreements, which promotes a win-win relationship between parties, supported by good faith and agreements outside the original contract; and (3) alliancing/relational, which uses a formal agreement to align objectives and interests of the parties in mutual benefit for the project. These types of relational/contractual interactions are implemented in an informal matrix that supports the selection of the optimal type of interaction for a determined project. There is also a discussion of the potential consequences of the correct selection of a relationship type so as to improve the project performance and the relationships of the parties involved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alliancing; contracting; lean project delivery; partnering; relational contracts |
| Index terms: | contractual relationship, construction project, interview, agreements, project management, lean project delivery, interaction, project performance, good faith, alliancing, partnering |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, contractual relationship, contractual arrangements, contract formation, production management, project management theory and practice, lean construction, professional ethics, behavioral psychology, partnership management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here