Panas, A and Pantouvakis, J P (2014) Simulation-based and statistical analysis of the learning effect in floating caisson construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(1): 04013033, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The learning curve theory is implemented for the assessment and prediction of performance in repetitive and complex construction operations. The purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of learning curve concepts for the fabrication of floating caissons, a construction activity that has not been adequately explored in the published literature. Although standard statistics and simulation methods have been used, a direct comparison of the produced results, along with their emerging inferences, is attempted for the first time. In addition, simulation modeling is used to predict future performance within the learning curve paradigm. An extended version of an existing simulation platform (CaissonSim) is used to execute the computations. A straight-line model is applied to quantify the improvements in productivity and the dynamically changing learning rates. A comparative analysis of the results has shown that both the statistical and simulation-based approaches have yielded satisfactory results, although the level of accuracy and variability is differentiated. Thus, it is suggested that the synergetic implementation of both methods of analysis is more beneficial because, when combined, they provide a robust analytical framework.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | caissons; productivity; quantitative methods; simulation; statistics |
| Index terms: | accuracy, comparative analysis, quantitative method, caisson, computation, analytical framework, platform, construction activity, productivity, statistical analysis, construction operation, paradigm, simulation modelling, statistics, implementation, fabrication, variability |
| Subjects: | digital design, professional development, education and knowledge transfer, management, manufacturing engineering, statistical analysis, geotechnical engineering, computational methods, mathematical modelling, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, construction operations, data science |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here