Shapira, A and Elbaz, A (2014) Tower crane cycle times: Case study of remote-control versus cab-control operation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(12): 05014010, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Tower cranes commonly constitute the bottleneck of production on today's typical building construction projects, so shortening of crane cycle durations is often the key to increased site productivity. This case study examined one potential determinant of cycle duration that has been largely overlooked in the wide body of cycle time research, which is the operation mode (OM) of top-slewing tower cranes: from the cab or by remote control. This knowledge gap was addressed by providing quantitative substantiation to qualitative evaluations regarding the advantages and disadvantages of both OMs. The results revealed that there prevail certain conditions under which the two OMs may yield identical cycle times or even give remote operation an advantage. The study also identified that it is the balance between the fast-travel part of the cycle and the fine-maneuvering part that determines which of the two OMs will generate shorter cycle times. These findings will be useful for construction professionals who are charged with the task of selecting the OM best suited for their project when both OMs are optional or when assessing the cost of using a dictated OM. Equally important is the contribution for scholars of crane work as offered by the research method used in this study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; construction materials and methods; crane operation; cycle time; productivity; remote control; safety; time study; tower cranes |
| Index terms: | construction professional, tower crane, remote control, construction material, duration, determinant, productivity, case study, building construction |
| Subjects: | building materials, professional development, control systems, building construction, management, risk assessment, maintenance engineering, data collection methods, project controls |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Information Management, Time Control, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here