Votano, S and Sunindijo, R Y (2014) Client safety roles in small and medium construction projects in Australia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9): 04014045, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although research has been done to investigate construction safety and its importance, most has focused on construction organizations and workplace safety. There is still a need to investigate this issue by looking at stakeholders higher in the supply chain, particularly the ones who have the economic power to facilitate safety implementation. As such, this research has investigated the roles of construction clients on influencing safety performance. Data were collected using questionnaire surveys from employees working in small and medium construction projects in Australia. The findings of the research have not only confirmed the importance of clients in implementing safety, but also determined specific client roles that influence the development of safety climate in construction projects. It is recommended that clients should focus on the following six safety roles: participate in site-based safety program; review and analyze safety data; appoint safety team; select safe contractors; specify how safety is to be addressed in tenders; and perform regular checks on plant/equipment. Some clients may not consider safety as important as other traditional objectives, such as time, cost, environment, and quality. As such, they need to recognize the economic benefit of safety, thus becoming willing and committed to integrating safety into day-to-day business decisions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client safety roles; labor and personnel issues; safety climate; small and medium organizations |
| Index terms: | implementation, becoming, construction organization, construction client, Australia, questionnaire, program, construction project, safety performance, construction safety, safety climate, personnel, workplace safety, survey |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, organization, practitioner, contractual arrangements, management, software systems, production management, health safety and environment, Geography, occupational health and safety management, philosophical process, occupational health, environmental health |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here