Xiong, W and Zhang, X (2014) Concession renegotiation models for projects developed through public-private partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(5): 04014008, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Contractual agreements between public agencies and private companies in the form of public-private partnerships (PPPs) have proven to be beneficial to both the public and private sectors. However, PPPs expose the concessionaire to a number of potential risks over the long concession period and the concessionaire may not be able to recover the large initial investment and obtain a reasonable rate of return if significant difficulties occur in the concession period. Hosting governments normally allow concession renegotiations when certain serious risk scenarios occur. International PPP practices have shown conflicting results from renegotiations, and many renegotiations have raised serious questions about the viability of the PPP approach. To facilitate renegotiations between the public and private sectors, this research has developed a concession renegotiation framework and compensation models for three common compensation measures, namely, toll adjustment, contract extension, and annual subsidy or unitary payment adjustment. The key issue in developing a quantitative compensation model is to estimate future cash flows, in which future traffic demand and operation and maintenance costs are important stochastic variables. Time-series models have been used to forecast these stochastic variables.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | compensation; public-private partnerships; renegotiation; time-series analysis |
| Index terms: | cash flow, concessionaire, operation and maintenance, toll, agency, subsidy, time-series analysis, concession period, private sector, partnership, estimate, compensation, agreements |
| Subjects: | contract formation, financial and cost management, economic analysis, contract type, dispute resolution, partnership management, research evaluation and metrics, sociology, industry analysis, transportation engineering, financial management, contract structure, maintenance engineering |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here