Zhang, L; Zou, X and Kan, Z (2014) Improved strategy for resource allocation in repetitive projects considering the learning effect. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(11): 4014053, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Considering the learning effect while planning and scheduling repetitive construction projects can help provide a realistic forecast of their duration and resource requirements. This paper has developed an improved learning curve (LC) to replace the log-linear LC for monitoring improvement in workers' performance. The improved LC assumes that the manual work time of the specific unit converges to a nonzero constant rather than zero under a large number of repetitions. It also takes into account the influence of workers' prior experience and machinery in the learning process. An improved line-of-balance (LOB) model is then presented by integrating the proposed LC and a mechanism of resource allocation. The proposed LOB model can make use of the learning effect to minimize the total resource usage of a project, while meeting the requirements for work continuity and the target deadline of each activity. An illustrative example has been cited to demonstrate the capability of the model. The technique can help planners use the learning effect to get a more realistic and optimal schedule about resource utilization.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | learning effect; line-of-balance; project planning and design; repetitive project; resource allocation |
| Index terms: | scheduling, repetitive construction, strategy, project planning, resource utilization, resource allocation, repetitive project, monitoring, planner, duration |
| Subjects: | operations research, resource management, site logistics, profession, control systems, project controls, building construction, management, production management |
| Topics: | Time Control, Site Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here