Zhang, S; Du, C; Sa, W; Wang, C and Wang, G (2014) Bayesian-based hybrid simulation approach to project completion forecasting for underground construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(1): 04013031, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Real-time simulation is powerful in forecasting the completion probability of long-term projects with repetitive tasks but fails to consider the time-varying uncertainty of inputs caused by construction process variabilities. In this paper, an improved method is introduced for predicting the time-varying probability of project completion of ongoing underground cavern group projects using Bayesian updating techniques. Within a tailor-made hierarchical simulation model, the Bayesian approach is adopted to constantly update duration distributions of unfinished project activities according to onsite data. The probability of project completion can therefore be increasingly refined during the process. The methodology is further explained in a case study where its feasibility and advantage over traditional approaches are verified. The success may also be replicated in addressing other similar time-varying uncertainty issues inherently present in almost all construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian analysis; cost and schedule; excavation; forecasting; simulation; underground construction |
| Index terms: | methodology, construction process, construction project, excavation, Bayesian analysis, duration, underground construction, hybrid simulation, variability, onsite, case study, forecasting |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, project controls, geotechnical engineering, building construction, production management, research methods, construction operations, prediction and forecasting, modelling and simulation, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here