Empirical assessment of geographically based surface interpolation methods for adjusting construction cost estimates by project location

Zhang, S; Migliaccio, G C; Zandbergen, P A and Guindani, M (2014) Empirical assessment of geographically based surface interpolation methods for adjusting construction cost estimates by project location. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(6): 4014015, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The accuracy of cost estimates is crucial to the success of construction projects with knowledge of project location being fundamental to the outcome of cost estimating. Location factors are commonly used to adjust construction cost estimates by project location, but these factors are not available for all locations. To date, the nearest neighbor (NN) method, based on simple, proximity-based interpolation has been used when a city lacks a sampled location factor even if this method was not empirically validated. This paper provides several contributions. First, the validity of the proximity-based method was substantially supported through the analysis of the global spatial autocorrelation of the changes in location factors from 2005 to 2009. Using two established cost index databases, it was found that there is spatial correlation between cost indexes for specific cities. Therefore, cost estimators can spatially interpolate values to understand cost indexes at places that are not listed in the database. Second, comparing different spatial interpolation techniques, including NN for how well they can interpolate cost indexes across space revealed that two alternative methods, the conditional nearest neighbor (CNN) and the inverse distance weighted (IDW) methods, lead to more accurate estimates. These findings are relevant to industry practitioners because they justify the use of interpolation as well as identify how to obtain improvements in preliminary estimates by simply replacing an interpolation method with another. Last, this study also provided preliminary evidence supporting the development of spatial prediction models for construction costs, which is an additional point of departure from the existing body of knowledge.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction cost estimates; cost and schedule; project location adjustment; surface interpolation methods
Index terms: estimate, cost estimate, cost estimator, construction cost, database, cost index, validity, construction project, evidence, practitioner, body of knowledge, cost estimating, prediction model, accuracy
Subjects: knowledge management, financial and cost management, economic analysis, prediction and forecasting, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, practitioner, data management, production management, professional development
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here