Al Haj, R A and El-Sayegh, S M (2015) Time-cost optimization model considering float-consumption impact. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(5): 04015001, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The main objectives of construction projects are completing the project on time and within budget. Typically, there is a trade-off between time and cost. Time loss is costly and time savings can provide benefits to all the parties involved in the project. Time-cost optimization is essential for construction projects. The objective of time-cost optimization is to determine the optimum project duration corresponding to the minimum total cost. This is accomplished by shortening the duration of critical activities to reduce the overall project duration. Time-cost optimization techniques result in reducing the available total float for noncritical activities, and thus, reduce the schedule flexibility. This paper presents a nonlinear-integer programming model that is developed to solve the time-cost optimization problem taking into account the impact of total float loss. The model uses What'sBest solver to find an efficient solution to the optimization problem while incorporating the total float-loss cost calculated according to the float-commodity approach. The results are significant and allow project managers to exercise new trade-offs between time, cost, and flexibility, which will ultimately improve the chances of achieving project objectives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction project, consumption, cost optimization, time saving, integer programming, duration, exercise, project manager |
| Subjects: | production management, algorithms, economics, time analysis, project controls, consumer economics, health behaviours and lifestyles, profession |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Time Control, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here