Barry, W; Leite, F and O'Brien, W J (2015) Late deliverable risk catalog: Evaluating the impacts and risks of late deliverables to construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(4): 04014087, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The Construction Industry Institute (CII) Research Team (RT) 300, a collaborative effort between CII and the Construction Users Roundtable (CURT), was chartered to define and document the full range of impacts that late deliverables to construction can have on a project, and to better understand the far-reaching impacts of late deliverables at the construction site. Towards these goals, RT 300 developed the late deliverable risk catalog (LDRC) to organize and display the data collected through academic literature, industry surveys and questionnaires, and project case studies. To accompany the LDRC, RT 300 has also developed (1) an overview of the LDRC with suggested implementation strategies, (2) example applications of the research reported in this paper, (3) prevention recommendations for the most common late deliverables, and (4) lessons learned in managing late deliverables and mitigating their impacts. These topics have all been included in this paper to help the construction industry leverage the knowledge developed in the research reported in this paper into improved cost, schedule, safety, quality, and organizational performance through a greater understanding of risks associated with late deliverables to construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alignment; communication; implementation; information technologies; logistics; procurement; project management; research; risk management |
| Index terms: | survey, construction site, strategy, information technology, lessons learned, questionnaire, Construction Industry Institute, case study, project management, prevention, construction industry, implementation, risk management, organizational performance |
| Subjects: | work location, contractual arrangements, risk assessment, research organizations, data collection methods, computing systems, industry analysis, performance measurement, management, project management theory and practice, financial risk, professional development |
| Topics: | Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here