Two-phase earthwork optimization model for highway construction

Bogenberger, C; Dell'Amico, M; Fuellerer, G; Hoefinger, G; Iori, M; Novellani, S and Panicucci, B (2015) Two-phase earthwork optimization model for highway construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(6): 05015003, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

One of the main activities in highway construction is earthwork, which is a complex process involving excavation, transportation, and filling of large quantities of different earth material types. Earthwork operations are costly and undergo several constraints because of the fact that they have large environmental and social effects on the areas surrounding the construction site. Using mathematical models to produce a minimum-cost earthwork plan that satisfies all constraints is thus of great significance for enhancing the productivity of the overall construction project. This paper presents an earthwork optimization system on the basis of the use of linear programming that operates in a novel two-phase approach. In the first phase, an aggregate model determines the feasibility of the overall project, whereas in the second phase, disaggregate models determine the actual flows of each material. The two-phase quantitative method for earthwork optimization developed in this paper includes all features derived from the everyday activity of one of the major European companies in construction. It involves classical decisions, such as excavations, fillings, use of quarries and dump sites, and the temporary rent of depots, but it also accounts for several novelties, including the use of recycling facilities and the explicit integration with the existing public road network. Extensive computational results are obtained by running the models on a set of realistic instances, and show the efficiency of the proposed approach in solving complex earthwork problems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: earthwork; highway construction; linear programming; mathematical models; quantitative methods
Index terms: integration, construction project, quantitative method, excavation, construction site, earthwork, mathematical model, highway construction, productivity, recycling, aggregate, linear programming, efficiency
Subjects: organizational analysis, production management, management, algorithms, performance management, civil engineering, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, construction methods, work location, waste management, materials science, mathematical modelling
Topics: Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here