Dharmapalan, V; Gambatese, J A; Fradella, J and Moghaddam Vahed, A (2015) Quantification and assessment of safety risk in the design of multistory buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(4): 04014090, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Research has shown that construction worker safety and health is influenced by the design of the permanent structure being constructed. Architects and design engineers have the opportunity to positively affect construction worker safety and health through the choices they make in the design process. Lack of designer knowledge about construction processes and limited availability of tools to assist in assessing the safety risk associated with a design are considered as inhibitors to implementation of the design for construction safety (DfCS) concept. This paper presents research conducted to quantify the construction safety risk of each of the design elements present in typical multistory buildings in the United States. The major research efforts were (1) identification of the typical building design elements and associated construction activities; (2) quantification of the unit and cumulative risks of the design elements and construction activities; and (3) development of an online design risk-assessment tool. Absolute safety risks were quantified for 141 design elements and 683 construction activities using the survey-analytical research method. The risk factors developed were incorporated into an online tool titled Safety in Design Risk Evaluator (SliDeRulE). The research contributes to the construction industry body of knowledge by providing quantitative values that link specific design features to construction safety. The website is designed to assist building designers with assessing the level of construction safety risk associated with their designs and is intended for use by designers during the design phase to create buildings that are safer to construct.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; design; labor; labor and personnel issues; personnel issues; risk; safety |
| Index terms: | design process, United States, personnel, survey, design risk, construction process, body of knowledge, construction safety, quantification, building design, designer, engineer, construction activity, architect, risk factor, design phase, implementation, construction industry, construction worker |
| Subjects: | architectural design, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, construction operations, professional practice, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, design methods, measurement and scaling, building construction, environmental hazards, environmental health, industry analysis, management, financial risk, Geography |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Design Practice, Site Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here