Esmaeili, B; Hallowell, M R and Rajagopalan, B (2015) Attribute-based safety risk assessment. II: Predicting safety outcomes using generalized linear models. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(8): 04015022, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
One of the recent advancements in preconstruction safety management is the identification and quantification of risks associated with fundamental attributes of construction work environments that cause injuries. The goal of this paper is to test the validity of using these fundamental risk attributes to predict safety outcomes. The modeling approach required two steps, as follows: (1) a principal component analysis was performed on the safety attributes to reduce dimension of the data and remove collinearity among attributes (the principle component analysis provided insights into the relative importance of the various attributes and provided an orthogonal decomposition of the data), and (2) the leading principal components (which are orthogonal by definition) were used as potential predictors in a generalized linear model with a logit link function to model the probability of different accident categories. The predictive power was then assessed using a rank probability skill score, which quantified the probabilistic skill of the forecasts over the categories. The analysis shows strong predictive skill, making the models attractive for safety managers to use to skilfully forecast the probability of a safety incident given identifiable characteristics of planned work. Researchers in the technology domain may find these models useful in predicting safety outcomes during design, work packaging, and scheduling.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | generalized linear models; labor and personnel issues; predictive models; principal component analysis; safety risk management |
| Index terms: | safety management, injury, scheduling, relative importance, personnel, manager, dimension, modelling, component analysis, risk management, construction work, risk assessment, principal component analysis, validity, quantification |
| Subjects: | health conditions and diseases, measurement and scaling, occupational health and safety management, statistical analysis, management, financial risk, operations management, operations research, analytical methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, evaluation and assessment methods, risk assessment, practitioner |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here