Golabchi, A; Han, S; Seo, J; Han, S; Lee, S and Al-Hussein, M (2015) An automated biomechanical simulation approach to ergonomic job analysis for workplace design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(8): 04015020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are reported to be the most common category of nonfatal occupational injuries that result in days away from work and are also a leading cause of temporary and permanent disability. One of the most effective approaches to preventing WMSDs is to evaluate ergonomics considerations early in the design and construction planning stage before the worker encounters the unsafe conditions. However, a lack of tools for identifying potential ergonomic risks in a proposed workplace design has led to difficulties in integrating safety and health into workplace design practice. In an effort to address this issue, this study explores a motion data-driven framework for ergonomic analysis that automates and visualizes the evaluation process in a virtual workplace. This is accomplished by coupling the ergonomic analysis with three-dimensional (3D) virtual visualization of the work environment. The proposed approach uses motion data from the 3D model of the jobsite to evaluate the risk factors that can produce excessive physical loads on the human body through a biomechanical analysis. A global risk assessment of musculoskeletal disorders is performed on worker motions first, and a biomechanical simulation is then used to further analyze unsafe motions by estimating internal loads on each selected body joint of the worker and redesigning the motion and workplace accordingly. As a case study, several tasks taking place in a construction prefabrication shop are modeled and analyzed to modify the workplace and ensure improved ergonomic safety. The results indicate that the proposed approach enables identification and minimization of awkward worker postures in the virtual model to mitigate ergonomic risk during workplace design.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | biomechanical analysis; construction worker safety; ergonomics; information technologies; prevention through design; three-dimensional visualization; work-related musculoskeletal disorder; workplace design |
| Index terms: | visualization, 3D model, disability, design and construction, minimization, risk factor, prevention, case study, risk assessment, injury, prefabrication, work environment, coupling, estimating, construction worker, workplace design, job analysis, information technology, ergonomics |
| Subjects: | building construction, algorithms, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, workforce, computational design, data collection methods, design practice, computing systems, practitioner, environmental hazards, financial risk, contractual arrangements, management, systems engineering, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Design Practice, Procurement, Cost Management, Human Resources, Health and Safety, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here