Hu, H and Zhu, Y (2015) Social welfare-based concession model for build/operate/transfer contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(1): 04014064, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The concession period is one of the critical factors in the arrangement of a build-operate-transfer contract. For infrastructure that has major strategic, economic, and social effects, the concession period should balance the interests among the private investors, the government, and the users. However, existing research has more frequently discussed economic benefits rather than social welfare. In this regard, this paper proposes an improved model based on the traditional concession model by taking into account the case that the government might lower the service price in the posttransfer period to increase social welfare. This paper also introduces the optimal pricing methods for both concession and posttransfer period. The proposed methodology suggests a narrower concession interval, which helps improve the negotiation efficiency between the government and the private investor to a certain extent. The application of the proposed model is demonstrated by a case study of Western Harbor Tunnel in Hong Kong, and the outcome shows that a significant improvement was made when taking into account social welfare.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | methodology, tunnel, negotiation, build-operate-transfer, critical factor, pricing, case study, concession period, efficiency, Hong Kong, investor |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, conflict resolution, sociology, Geography, contract structure, performance management, research methods, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here