Jonsson, H and Rudberg, M (2015) Production system classification matrix: Matching product standardization and production-system design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(6): 05015004, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The potential benefits of using off-site production in residential construction have been highlighted in many studies, but the full potential of off-site production approaches is not always realized. This shortfall can be explained by the mismatch between market requirements and the output offered by the production system; in other words, a mismatch between the degree of product standardization and the design of the production system. This mismatch could be resolved through a classification matrix that aids decision makers in matching market requirements and the degree of product standardization with the degree of off-site production and production system design. This paper describes the development of a classification matrix that guides the decision-making process during the designing of new, or redesigning of existing, production systems in residential construction. An important aspect of the development was balancing the trade-off between productivity and flexibility so that products can be produced competitively. The merits of the classification matrix are exemplified by five case companies with different approaches to industrialization and off-site production. The main contribution is the classification matrix per se that reflects different production systems' strengths and weaknesses and thereby aids managers in balancing the productivity-flexibility trade-off to be able to meet the market requirements in the most profitable way. The matrix also supports researchers in analyzing and comparing different production systems used for producing residential buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; off-site production; process choice; production strategy; project planning and design; residential building |
| Index terms: | production system, manager, industrialization, project planning, case study, residential building, production strategy, decision-making process, productivity, residential construction, off-site production, standardization, mismatch |
| Subjects: | control systems, practitioner, construction type, engineering problems, data collection methods, construction integration, performance measurement, management, economic development, manufacturing engineering, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here