Kim, H; Lee, H S; Park, M; Ahn, C R and Hwang, S (2015) Productivity forecasting of newly added workers based on time-series analysis and site learning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(9): 5015008, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Adding new laborers during construction is usually considered the easiest option to execute when a schedule delay occurs in a construction project. However, determining the proper number of new laborers to add is quite challenging because newly added laborers' short-term productivity for their first several production cycles could be significantly different from that of existing laborers. While existing studies suggest that newly added laborers' site-learning may cause such a difference, this process has not been considered when forecasting newly added laborers' short-term productivity. In this context, this study presents a method that takes into account site-learning effects and the periodic characteristics of newly added laborers' short-term productivity. The periodic characteristics of productivity are analyzed based on a time-series model of existing laborers' productivity. Then, the impact of the site-learning effect on the productivity is considered based on existing learning-effect theory. An illustrative example demonstrates the accuracy and usefulness of the presented method. Its results indicate that the consideration of the site-learning effect prevents the frequent and counterproductive underestimation of the required number of newly added laborers in establishing an accelerated recovery schedule.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | productivity forecasting; quantitative methods; schedule delay; site-learning effect; time-series analysis |
| Index terms: | forecasting, accuracy, time-series analysis, construction project, recovery, quantitative method, option, schedule delay, productivity |
| Subjects: | project controls, production management, operations management, decision analysis, professional development, research evaluation and metrics, data analysis and analytics, prediction and forecasting, management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Time Control, Information Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here