Scheduling policies for the stochastic resource leveling problem

Li, H; Xu, Z and Demeulemeester, E (2015) Scheduling policies for the stochastic resource leveling problem. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(2): 04014072, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

When uncertainties come into play, the leveled baseline schedule obtained by solving the deterministic resource leveling problem can hardly be executed as planned and this schedule may even become infeasible. In addition, traditional stochastic methods may also suffer from not being able to produce satisfactorily leveled schedules. Therefore, there is a pressing need for new procedures that are capable of dealing with resource leveling subject to uncertainties. The writers study the resource leveling problem subject to activity durations uncertainty where the usage of renewable resources needs to be leveled over time. Two heuristics for producing scheduling policies are presented with the objective of minimizing the expected sum of the weighted coefficient of variation of the resource usage. The two heuristics represent two different ways of tackling the stochastic resource leveling problem. The first heuristic, a modified version of the Burgess and Killebrew leveling procedure, obtains a scheduling policy by solving the deterministic equivalent of the stochastic resource leveling problem. The second heuristic, a simulation-based tabu search procedure, directly works with the stochastic resource leveling problem. Computational experiments are conducted on the well-known project scheduling problem library (PSPLIB) J90 instances.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost and schedule; project scheduling; scheduling policies; stochastic activity durations; stochastic resource leveling problem; tabu search
Index terms: renewable resources, variation, resource levelling, scheduling, duration, experiment, heuristic, project scheduling
Subjects: data collection methods, contractual condition, project controls, risk assessment, resource management, environmental resource management, operations research
Topics: Risk Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Time Control, Contract Administration, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here