Li, Y; Lu, Y; Li, D and Ma, L (2015) Metanetwork analysis for project task assignment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(12): 04015044, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Early studies of project planning endorsed a task-centric method, such as the program evaluation and review technique (PERT), that assigns relationships and tasks based upon the logical sequences of construction. This method works for projects with clearly assigned tasks, specific requirements, finely tuned organizations, and explicit roles and responsibilities for the project team. However, for projects that exist in a fast-paced and complex environment and are performed by temporary organizations, this task-centric method neglects the interdependence between project tasks and project contextual factors, such as project organizations, teams, knowledge, and resources that have considerable effect on task completion and project effectiveness. To investigate the congruence, the matching degree, between task assignment and the project's organizational environment, this study uses a three-dimensional metanetwork analysis (MNA) to model a project's personnel [hereinafter referred to as agents (A)], knowledge (K), tasks (T), and all six interconnected networks: AA, AK, AT, KK, KT, and TT networks. MNA can identify incapable agents and overloaded tasks, which hinder the completion of tasks, and then it can optimize task assignment to achieve better project performance. Cross-case comparative studies of 11 Chinese automobile dealership construction projects were conducted in order to validate the proposed MNA model and optimization strategies. During the project optimization, three key network-level measures - the congruence of agent knowledge needs (COAK), the congruence of task knowledge needs (COTK), and task completion based on knowledge (TCK) - increased by 22.1, 24.6, and 47.3%, respectively. The results demonstrate that MNA can advance project task assignment theory to interactively analyze tasks and relevant organizational factors. Practical implications for diagnosing project organizations and task adjustments are also discussed at the end of the study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction projects; meta-network analysis; network analysis; organizational issues; project network; task assignment |
| Index terms: | organizational issue, project team, interdependence, comparative study, project performance, effectiveness, programme evaluation and review technique, temporary organization, network analysis, organizational factor, agent, project planning, organizational environment, construction project, strategy, project organization, personnel, project network |
| Subjects: | sociology, organizational analysis, project management theory and practice, organizational theory, production management, performance management, management, project delivery, project planning, data analysis and analytics, operations research, control systems, practitioner, research design and methodology, business |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here