Ma, G; Gu, L and Li, N (2015) Scenario-based proactive robust optimization for critical-chain project scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(10): 04015030, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The robustness of construction project schedules is a key factor that determines the capability of the schedules in offsetting the negative impact of uncertainties, which are the primary causes of project delays. This paper proposes a scenario-based proactive robustness optimization (SBPRO) method, which aims to improve the robustness of construction project schedules that are developed using the critical-chain project management (CCPM) method. The SBPRO method integrates scenarios that represent all possible situations that may happen during project implementation. Therefore, schedules are less sensitive to variations of situations than schedules developed using the traditional CCPM-based scheduling method. Moreover, the SBPRO method is based on a dual-objective function and optimizes schedules by balancing a trade-off between two objectives, namely, reducing the length of planned schedules and mitigating the uncertainties in schedule execution. The SBPRO method was validated in three case studies. The results showed that the SBPRO method outperformed the traditional CCPM-based scheduling method by generating schedules that could ensure higher probabilities of on-time project completion. The results also demonstrated that the SBPRO method could serve to promote the understanding and acceptance among project teams of the trade-off between project duration and schedule robustness when managing complex construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost and schedule; critical-chain project management; duration; robustness; scenario; scheduling |
| Index terms: | project team, project management, duration, implementation, case study, construction project, variation, project delay, project scheduling, scheduling |
| Subjects: | project delivery, contractual arrangements, operations research, data collection methods, project controls, project management theory and practice, contractual condition, production management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Procurement, Time Control, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here