Matthews, J C and Stowe, R (2015) Critical data needs associated with asbestos cement pipe renewal methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(1): 06014009, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Asbestos cement (AC) pipe accounts for approximately 15% of the total length of water distribution system piping in North America. Pipe renewal activities are needed to maintain these pipes as they deteriorate, but concerns over the environmental impact and regulations associated with these construction methods are largely misunderstood. Confusion around these issues led this study to determine (1) what the regulations allow, (2) which renewal methods are applicable, and (3) the critical data needs associated with these methods when used for AC pipe renewal. This paper describes current AC pipe renewal regulations and practices (e.g., pipe bursting, cured-in-place pipe lining, etc.) and the critical data needs relating to AC pipe renewal (e.g., study of the asbestos fibers released in air, water, and soil during construction). These findings are valuable for water utilities in need of solutions for renewing their aging AC pipes and in understanding regulations. The recommendations highlight the needed investigation into the environmental impact of AC pipe renewal construction, which when completed will help clarify future regulations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asbestos cement pipe; construction materials and methods; environmental impact of construction; pipe rehabilitation |
| Index terms: | construction material, investigation, environmental impact, renewal, construction method, water utility, regulation, water distribution |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, building materials, data collection methods, building construction, political science, renovation and retrofit, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Governance, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here