Moon, S; Zekavat, P R and Bernold, L E (2015) Dynamic control of construction supply chain to improve labor performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(6): 05015002, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
One of the critical tasks in the construction industry is to accomplish the required levels of quality. In considering the quality as a managerial target, former methodologies stipulated that the ultimate goal should be focused on final quality. However, with the advent of total quality management, the dynamic approach began to grab the attention of the research field. The goal of this research is to present a proactive concept of quality control that is holistic in nature, defining quality as a function of process waste generated along the construction supply chain. To verify the proposed method, the field testing in this paper discusses the prefabricated rebar supply system of an actual construction site in Kensington, New South Wales, Australia. The high quality of rebar supply ensured by the master-bundle concept enabled the steel fixers to increase their productive time from 31.5 to 77.4%. As expected, this radical change was accompanied by a drastic reduction of process waste from 45.5 to 6.2%. The realization of these substantial performance improvements will rest on the industry's ability to adopt mutually supportive relationships and agile communication channels across the supply chain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction site, dynamic control, total quality management, process waste, New South Wales, methodology, Australia, steel fixer, quality control, construction industry, field testing, rebar, construction supply chain, performance improvement |
| Subjects: | control systems, practitioner, waste management, construction logistics, building materials, work location, project delivery, evaluation methods, professional practice, research methods, performance measurement, Geography, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here