O'Connor, J T; O'Brien, W J and Choi, J O (2015) Standardization strategy for modular industrial plants. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(9): 4015026, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Modularization is a well-established technique in which a portion of site-based work is exported to fabrication shops, thereby contributing to an improved construction. When modularization is combined with design standardization, according to the literature of the shipbuilding and manufacturing industries, the result is a leveraging opportunity. Such an approach can incorporate all the benefits from both design standardization and modularization and can constitute a strategy for augmenting modularization. This paper addresses a leveraging opportunity for modularization augmentation by examining how modularization and design standardization relate to one another in the industrial sector. A research team comprised of industrial and academic members identified standard modules as well as a modular standardized plant (MSP) as distinct approaches to combining modularization and design standardization. The research further identified 10 types of economic advantages and 3 types of economic disadvantages when the two are combined. Consequently, the paper documents case studies to provide further insight into the characteristics of modular projects with standard design, the assessment results of its impact and benefits, and the lessons learned.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | industrial plants; modular; modularization; project planning and design; standardization; strategic planning |
| Index terms: | module, strategic planning, modularization, standardization, fabrication, case study, shipbuilding, documents, project planning, lessons learned, strategy, manufacturing industry |
| Subjects: | building construction, industry analysis, manufacturing engineering, management, architectural elements, performance measurement, professional development, data collection methods, control systems |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here