Association between perceived risk and training in the construction industry

Rodríguez-Garzón, I; Lucas-Ruiz, V; Martínez-Fiestas, M and Delgado-Padial, A (2015) Association between perceived risk and training in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(5): 04014095, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper studies risk perception of Spanish construction workers and its relation with the demographic variable of training. The study sample was analyzed by means of hierarchical conglomerate and cluster analyses. The model used to establish the clusters is based on the psychometric paradigm. Two different risk perception groups were singled out. There was an attempt to identify, after analyzing each cluster, their relation with different sociodemographic variables. Only the worker training variable showed a statistically significant relation with the two cluster analysis groups. As a result, the perception of risk of the best-trained group was higher than that of the less-trained group.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: organizational issues; prevention; psychometric paradigm; risk perception; safety in construction; safety management; safety training
Index terms: paradigm, organizational issue, construction worker, construction industry, prevention, safety training, demographic variable, risk perception, cluster analysis, safety management
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, business, practitioner, demography, occupational health and safety management, environmental hazards, industry analysis, education and knowledge transfer, financial risk
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here