Shen, Y; Koh, T Y; Rowlinson, S and Bridge, A J (2015) Empirical investigation of factors contributing to the psychological safety climate on construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(11): 04015038, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Employees' safety climate perceptions dictate their safety behavior because individuals act based on their perceptions of reality. Extensive empirical research in applied psychology has confirmed this relationship. However, rare efforts have been made to investigate the factors contributing to a favorable safety climate in construction research. As an initial effort to address the knowledge gap, this paper examines factors contributing to a psychological safety climate, an operationalization of a safety climate at the individual level, and, hence, the basic element of a safety climate at higher levels. A multiperspective framework of contributors to a psychological safety climate is estimated by a structural equation modeling technique using individual questionnaire responses from a random sample of construction project personnel. The results inform management of three routes to psychological safety climate: a client's proactive involvement in safety management, a workforce-friendly workplace created by the project team, and transformational supervisors' communication about safety matters with the workforce. This paper contributes to the field of construction engineering and management by highlighting a broader contextual influence in a systematic formation of psychological safety climate perceptions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project; organizational issues; psychological safety climate; random sample; structural equation modeling |
| Index terms: | psychology, safety management, questionnaire, construction project, psychological safety, structural equation modelling, construction site, safety climate, personnel, organizational issue, project team, supervisor, investigation, construction engineering, safety behaviour |
| Subjects: | work location, project delivery, data collection methods, business, practitioner, occupational health and safety management, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology, management, engineering methods, health safety and environment, production management |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Site Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here